Dr Claude Rakisits (1956) was born in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo and holds the Australian and Swiss nationality. He holds a PhD in Political Science and a B.A (Hons) in International Relations.
Mr. Rakisits is specialized in Pakistan and Africa and currently works as Adjunct Professor in International Relations at Webster University (Geneva).
He is also head of “Geopolitical Assessments”, an independent consultancy whose core business is to provide analysis and advice on international issues:
The ‘Geopolitical Passport’ series offers visitors to ExploringGeopolitics a unique opportunity to find out more about the enormous variety of views within the geopolitical traditions. The floor has been given to scholars from several countries and various disciplines. The questions address issues all people with an interest in geopolitics grapple with. How should we define it? What are the most fascinating geopolitical ideas? And how will the geopolitical future look like?
My relationship with geopolitics
At what age did you discover geopolitics and what attracted you to it?
I suppose I discovered geopolitics (not that it was called that then) when I was doing my doctoral thesis in my late 20s. My thesis was on national integration in Pakistan, analysing the role of religion, ethnicity and the external environment in that process. This analysis required bringing together a number of factors that were inter-related and which had an impact on one another and on the integration (or disintegration) process of Pakistan. Geopolitics was an excellent analytical tool to examine this subject.
Which geopolitical topics have your focus and why did you choose especially these?
Swat Valley, Pakistan
Photo courtesy of the interviewee
I have been interested in Pakistan for well over 25 years now. However, as I was also an international relations practitioner – I was in the Australian public service for almost 20 years – I was not always able to pay as much attention to it as I would have liked. The other main area of focus for me has been geopolitics in Africa and this for two reasons: on a personal level because I was born in the then Belgian Congo and lived in other parts of Africa subsequently; and, on a professional level, I was an intelligence and research analyst and policy officer on African issues when I worked in a number of federal departments in Canberra.
What do you consider your most important contribution to geopolitics?
I believe my most important contribution has been my doctoral thesis which, quite uniquely, looked at domestic and external factors in the process of integration in Pakistan. Other studies which examined Pakistan tended to look at one or the other of these facets separately but never the two combined. This was somewhat odd, particularly given the importance of geography in the political development of Pakistan.
My geopolitical preferences
What is your favourite definition of geopolitics?
I define it as the integrated study of the interaction between a given state’s domestic factors (ethnicity, religion, population etc), external factors (bilateral and multilateral relations), its specific geography and the government’s policies. I have chosen that definition because it best explains countries’ behaviour, as no country exists in a geographic or political vacuum.
Which geopolitical scientist do you admire the most?
Having been a practitioner rather than an academic until recently, two of my favourite geopolitical scientists were also “high-stake” practitioners: Henry Kissinger and Zbigniew Brezezinski. Although they are both very different individuals, their application of realpolitik – a bit too raw for many – demonstrated the importance of geopolitics as a tool of analysis.
What is your favourite geopolitical book?
I tend to focus more on geopolitical-oriented journal articles because of the time sensitivity of the issues in question. Nevertheless, one of my favourite recent books is Dr Zbigniew Brezezinski’s The Grand Chessboard. And although 10 years old now, its analysis is still very current, confirming that good analysis remains permanent.
What is your favourite geopolitical website?
There are some excellent websites now available. But two I can recommend are:
The first one is run by the respectable Council on Foreign Relations and the latter one is the site of a relatively new but highly-regarded Australian think tank.
Our geopolitical future
In what direction(s) will geopolitical science be heading the coming decades?
That’s a rather difficult question to answer without a crystal ball! But, I suspect, there will be a greater focus on the strategic angle of geopolitics, particularly given the strategic importance of many of the conflicts now besieging us.
Which geopolitical subject has been too little in the spotlight and needs further research?
Given the many conflicts around the world, there will need to be more analysis done on the interaction and relationship between environmental conditions (desertification, climate change, environmental degradation, loss of farmland for crops, poor agricultural infrastructure, etc ) and conflict (ethnic, inter- and intra-state, religious, terrorism).
What will be the largest geopolitical challenge for the world in the 21st century?
I believe these will be: rapid environmental change, global energy competition, the rise of China, and sustainable economic development in the Third World.
Geopolitical Assessments is an independent consultancy whose core business is to provide analysis and advice on international issues to various clients. The consultancy also initiates ideas which aim to assist with the development of government policies.
“Pakistan’s Musharraf: Playing a balancing act”, Strategic Insight 21, Australian Strategic Policy Institute, 2005.
Contact details of Mr. Rakisits