Please click here with left mouse button to go to home page

Home

Welcome to ExploringGeopolitics

The website in a nutshell

Website maintenance

16 December 2011

Page name changes

In December, the editor evaluated the website's structure and design. This process led to the re-naming of some sections, pages and url's. Although links on the website have been updated, search engines may refer to old page names for a while. Therefore, you could end up on homepage after selecting a link to another page. Our apologies for any incovenience.

80 contributors: the key lesson

17 October 2011

The website started in January 2009 and this month, we welcome the 80th contributor. I would like to seize this opportunity to express my gratitude to all contributors for their support and enthusiasm.

But what is the essence of geopolitics? Let's ask a couple of experts who have contributed.

Simon Dalby, for example, argues that "I don’t define geopolitics! It’s a term that refers to numerous modes of linking space and power, not a thing to be reduced to a stable definition."

Colin Flint says something similar: "So how should we define geopolitics, in the contemporary world and with the intent of offering a critical analysis? Our goals of understanding, analyzing, and being able to critique world politics require us to work with more than one definition."

Is it wrong that there is no widely accepted definition of geopolitics? No, it is not. Actually, the same holds true for all concepts that human beings have created: terrorism, nationalism, and so on.

Virginie Mamadouh's view in this regard reflects the spirit of ExploringGeopolitics well: "There is no definition that would do justice to the diversity of the approaches geopolitics covers and there is no need for a single definition. That is part of the fun."

Let me finish by recommending her contribution that clearly explains 'the many faces of geopolitics':

Virginie Mamadouh: Geopolitics in the 2000s

Looking ahead, I will continue to do my best to keep the website stimulating, enlightening and thought-provoking. So if you miss a particular topic here, please let me know, and I will see what I can do!

The sections on the website

If you are a first-time visitor, you may wonder: what are the seven sections of the website about?

To start, the Geopolitical Concepts, Traditions and Trends section looks into geopolitical theories and concepts, and contains the annual review.

Moreover, the Geopolitical Scholars sections hosts the Geopolitical Passport series that offers specialists an opportunity to give their views on this discipline. The interviews address issues such as books and the geopolitical future.

The Geography, Politics, International Relations section with a broad range of topics such as Cartography, Nationalism and Territory.

The Energy, Water and Resource Scarcity section provides a good insight into the views of experts in the field regarding strategic resources.

Furthermore, the contributions in the Africa and Europe/The Americas, Asia and The Middle East sections focus specifically on a country or region.

Finally, the Study and Research Support section provides information about geopolitical courses. It further discusses books, conferences and so on.

Web page approval (W3C)

Valid CSS! Valid RSS! Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict

Recommended contributions

Most popular contributions

2 February 2012

William Worster picture
William Worster

William Worster's contribution about sovereignty is this month's new number one. A primer in the ranking is the presence of three contributors with two pieces: Mahdi Ahouie (on Iran), Saul Cohen (on US) and Nathalène Reynolds (on Pakistan).

  • Ranking refers to January 2012.
  • Last month's position in brackets.
  • Data provided by Google Analytics.

Recent contributions

Updates

Last update: 2 February 2012

  • New ranking of most popular contributions (centre column).

Next update: 10 February

  • Geopolitical Passport of John Morrissey (National University of Ireland, Galway)

Simon Dalby on Security

January 2012

picture

Professor Simon Dalby works at Carleton University in Ottawa and is co-editor of the Geopolitics journal.

In this interview, he talks about the Cold War, global warming, the ideas of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, geographical imaginations, political discourses and so on.

Professor Dalby concludes the interview with suggestions about how geographers could help improving global and local security conditions:

Simon Dalby 1: Security Definition, Otherness, Cold War, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke

Simon Dalby 2: Discourses, threats, dichotomies, USSR communism, Al-Qaida terrorism

Simon Dalby 3: Climate change, humanity, capitalism, modernity, geographers

Dalby cover

"Geographical language structures politics in terms of our space being that where virtue, safety, culture and prosperity lie; their space is foreign, different and hence potentially threatening. When difference becomes threatening tropes of security are invoked to justify preparation for conflict and reinforce group identities."

Geopolitical Review of 2011

December 2011/January 2012

logo ExploringGeopolitics

For the third consecutive year, EG contributors discuss the most significant geopolitical events of the year:

Chitty / Dalby: 2011 Geopolitical Review - social media / Durban climate conference

Crampton / Elden: 2011 Geopolitical Review - WikiLeaks / 'Occupy' protests

picture Stuart Elden
Stuart Elden: "One of the great ironies of the financial crisis is that the dominant response has been more, not less, neoliberal policies. It is being recoded as a crisis within neoliberalism, instead of being seen as the crisis of neoliberalism."

Cohen: 2011 Geopolitical Review - global events and US foreign policy

picture Saul Cohen
Saul Cohen: "Events of 2011 highlight the U.S. need to partner with other Great Powers and selected Regional Powers, and to apply ‘soft’ power as the first recourse in furthering its strategic interests. This is likely to guide American foreign policy in the years ahead, as the international system becomes more strongly balanced. This era is likely to be defined neither as the American nor as the Chinese Century, but as the Global Century."

Mamadouh: 2011 Geopolitical Review - financialization and resistance