The website offers over 200 contributions by more than 100 scholars from over 20 countries stretching across various geopolitical disciplines.
Arjen Hoekstra is professor in Water Management at the University of Twente. He obtained his MSc degree in Civil Engineering (cum laude) and PhD degree in Policy Analysis at Delft University of Technology.
Professor Hoekstra has taught a broad range of topics such as water resources management, river basin and coastal zone management, hydrology and water quality, sustainable development, natural resources valuation, environmental systems analysis, and policy analysis. Moreover, he has conducted research in disciplines such as earth and environmental sciences, economics, engineering, anthropology, and policy sciences.
Professor Hoekstra established the interdisciplinary field of water footprint and virtual water trade analysis. This research field focuses on the relations between water management, consumption and trade. He further created the water footprint concept in 2002 and co-founded the Water Footprint Network in 2008. For more information:
In the interview, professor Hoekstra stresses the need to assess water scarcity on a global level by taking into account concepts such as virtual water and national water footprints. The interview also addresses other water-related issues. What country has the largest national footprint? Why needs water to have a value? Which countries are very dependent on water-intensive commodities?
It is generally thought that water is a local resource, to be managed at catchment or river basin level. However, it is not. Freshwater issues should really be considered in a global context. Local water depletion and pollution are often closely tied to the structure of the global economy. Water is often used to produce exported goods. International trade in commodities implies long-distance transfers of water in virtual form, where virtual water is understood as the volume of water that has been used to produce a commodity and that is thus virtually embedded in it. Knowledge about the virtual-water flows entering and leaving a country can cast a completely new light on the actual water scarcity of a country. For example, Jordan imports about 5 to 7 billion m3 of virtual water per year, which is in sharp contrast with the 1 billion m3 of water withdrawn annually from domestic water sources. This means that people in Jordan apparently survive owing to the import of water-intensive commodities from elsewhere, for example the USA.
It becomes increasingly relevant to consider the linkages between consumption of people and impacts on freshwater systems. This can improve our understanding of the processes that drive changes imposed on freshwater systems and help to develop policies of wise water governance. I introduced the water-footprint concept as an indicator that maps the human consumption on global freshwater resources. Trade can enhance global water use efficiency, but at the same time it can simply shift the environmental burden to a distant location.
International trade in water-intensive goods like food, cotton and paper means that the demand for water is shifted from the place of consumption to the place of production. Many countries, like most European countries, have thus largely externalised their water footprint.
I have defined the virtual-water content of a product as the volume of freshwater that is used to produce the product, measured over the various steps of the production chain. In this way it has become a measurable variable. The term virtual water may be a bit confusing because we are talking about real water! The adjective ‘virtual’ refers to the fact that most of the water used to produce a product is not contained in the product. The real-water content of products is generally negligible if compared to the virtual-water content.
It is important to know how much water leaves or enters a country in virtual form. Water-scarce countries can reduce the pressure on domestic water resources by making sure that cheap water-intensive products are imported and only water-extensive high-value commodities are exported. In other words: importing grains in the Middle East resolves water shortages in this region. It’s too simple to say that virtual water trade resolves conflict, but careful analysis of how a national production and trade pattern influences the domestic water system will obviously enhance the knowledge base for making wise decisions.
The water footprint of an individual or community is defined as the total volume of freshwater that is used to produce the goods and services consumed by the individual or community. The water footprint of a nation shows water use related to consumption within a nation. The water footprint of the Dutch community, for example, also refers to the use of water for rice production in Thailand (insofar as the rice is exported to the Netherlands for consumption there). Conversely, the water footprint of a nation excludes water that is used within the national territory for producing commodities for export, which are consumed elsewhere.
Traditionally, water use is measured by looking at the freshwater withdrawals for the various sectors of the economy. As a result, water policies have always focused on the direct water users, leaving indirect water users out of scope. The water footprint concept takes a supply-chain perspective. By looking at the water footprint of final consumer goods, the attention shifts to the role of consumers and large food processors and retailers that process and sell final consumer goods. Both consumers and companies can have a vital role in mitigating problems of water depletion and pollution. And governments can take responsibility by enforcing product transparency, so that consumers can trust that what they consume is produced without jeopardizing scarcely available freshwater resources.
The USA has a water footprint per head that is double the world average. This is because they consume a lot of highly water-intensive goods, like meat. Some developing countries also have a high water footprint, not because they have such a large consumption, but because agriculture is highly inefficient with water.
Annual rain and annual river discharge are limited. Although we often would like to have more water, we cannot use more rain or river water then available at a certain location and point in time. In other words, freshwater is scarce. The fact that water is a public resource without a market to establish a trade price for it, does not mean it has no value. Treating water as if it has no value – which is current practice in many places on earth – leads to overdraw and depletion. Decisions on water allocation should be based on its value.
Water has much in common with oil. Some countries have sufficient, others don’t. Both water and energy are key inputs into any economy, so countries without the basic source will depend on other countries that do have it. North Africa and the Middle East, but also countries like Mexico and Japan are heavily dependent on the import of water-intensive commodities.
Leonhardt van Efferink, editor of EG, will be convening a Country Risk Analysis Summer School at Maastricht University in July/August:
After clicking with left mouse button on book cover, an Amazon page (or publisher's) with book info appears in a new browser window.
Photo courtesy of the interviewee
"Globalization of Water: Sharing the Planet's Freshwater Resources", with Ashok K. Chapagain, Wiley-Blackwell, 2007.